Which statement best captures the security strategy emphasis in the era of great-power competition, regarding counterterrorism?

Study for the U.S. Military and National Defense Strategies Test. Enhance your understanding with multiple choice questions and insights. Prepare to excel in your examination!

Multiple Choice

Which statement best captures the security strategy emphasis in the era of great-power competition, regarding counterterrorism?

Explanation:
In the era of great-power competition, counterterrorism is pursued as part of a broader, alliance-based approach that combines capacity-building with targeted operations and places state competition at the forefront. This means working with partners to strengthen their CT capabilities, sharing intelligence and resources, and conducting precise operations where needed, rather than acting alone or in isolation. Building partner capacity helps sustain long-term security, reduces the burden on U.S. forces, and enhances resilience across regions, all while competing with state threats and shaping deterrence. Unilateral CT actions with no partner involvement undermine coalition gains and burden-sharing, which modern strategy relies on. Focusing only on cyber warfare would miss the broader, multi-domain nature of CT and the practical need for on-the-ground intelligence, governance, and local partnerships. Eliminating CT operations to reallocate to modernization ignores ongoing transnational threats and the reality that CT remains a vital piece of maintaining stability while competing with powerful state actors.

In the era of great-power competition, counterterrorism is pursued as part of a broader, alliance-based approach that combines capacity-building with targeted operations and places state competition at the forefront. This means working with partners to strengthen their CT capabilities, sharing intelligence and resources, and conducting precise operations where needed, rather than acting alone or in isolation. Building partner capacity helps sustain long-term security, reduces the burden on U.S. forces, and enhances resilience across regions, all while competing with state threats and shaping deterrence.

Unilateral CT actions with no partner involvement undermine coalition gains and burden-sharing, which modern strategy relies on. Focusing only on cyber warfare would miss the broader, multi-domain nature of CT and the practical need for on-the-ground intelligence, governance, and local partnerships. Eliminating CT operations to reallocate to modernization ignores ongoing transnational threats and the reality that CT remains a vital piece of maintaining stability while competing with powerful state actors.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy